RSS Feed
Thursday, May 6, 2010 | 
What is Erectile Dysfunction?
Erectile dysfunction, also known as impotence, is actually the inability of the penis to achieve or sustain an erection for satisfactory intercourse. It should be very clear that problem of Erectile Dysfunction is not similar to the problems of sexual desire and problems with ejaculation and orgasm.
Causes of Erectile Dysfunction
Erectile dysfunction can occur because of the following reasons:
Aging: Aging is one of the common reason of male impotence. Moreover, there are two main causes why older men experience erectile dysfunction than younger men. First, older men are more likely to develop diseases like diabetes mellitus, and high blood pressure etc. Second, the aging process alone can cause penis erectile dysfunction in some of the men.
Diabetes mellitus: It has also been observed that diabetic men develop erectile dysfunction 10-15 years earlier as compared to non diabetic men. Erectile dysfunction was reported by 55% of men between the ages of 50 to 60 years, in a population study conducted of men with type I diabetes for more than 10 years.
Cigarette smoking: Excessive smoking causes dysfunction of penis because cigarette smoking aggravates atherosclerosis.
Hypertension: Patients with excessive hypertension or arteriosclerosis have an increased risk of developing erectile dysfunction of penis.
Low testosterone levels: To maintain sex drive and to maintain nitric oxide levels in the, testosterone a primary sex hormone in men is responsible. So, men can suffer from low sex drive and erectile dysfunction having hypogonadism.
Depression and anxiety: Guilt, depression, anxiety, stress, low self-esteem, fear of sexual failure, these psychological factors can also be the reason for erectile dysfunction.
With proper medication, this problem of erectile dysfunction can be cured totally.
Causes of Erectile Dysfunction
Erectile dysfunction can occur because of the following reasons:
Aging: Aging is one of the common reason of male impotence. Moreover, there are two main causes why older men experience erectile dysfunction than younger men. First, older men are more likely to develop diseases like diabetes mellitus, and high blood pressure etc. Second, the aging process alone can cause penis erectile dysfunction in some of the men.
Diabetes mellitus: It has also been observed that diabetic men develop erectile dysfunction 10-15 years earlier as compared to non diabetic men. Erectile dysfunction was reported by 55% of men between the ages of 50 to 60 years, in a population study conducted of men with type I diabetes for more than 10 years.
Cigarette smoking: Excessive smoking causes dysfunction of penis because cigarette smoking aggravates atherosclerosis.
Hypertension: Patients with excessive hypertension or arteriosclerosis have an increased risk of developing erectile dysfunction of penis.
Low testosterone levels: To maintain sex drive and to maintain nitric oxide levels in the, testosterone a primary sex hormone in men is responsible. So, men can suffer from low sex drive and erectile dysfunction having hypogonadism.
Depression and anxiety: Guilt, depression, anxiety, stress, low self-esteem, fear of sexual failure, these psychological factors can also be the reason for erectile dysfunction.
With proper medication, this problem of erectile dysfunction can be cured totally.
2 comments:
I was pleasantly surprised to learn how recent the development of financial business management is. Prior to the 1950's financial data was rarely used to manage the day-to-day business and planning of operations. It was used extensively to keep score, but it's use was limited to reporting after the fact - to telling shareholders how the company actually did. That is what financial tools are really useful for; for counting the money, for reporting results to shareholders, for looking in the mirror to see what happened.But I'm shocked by how many companies that are planning improvement efforts look at it primarily as a financial, cost-accounting exercise. The magic formula they use - Profit equals Revenue less Costs - leads to very straight-forward decisions that never seem to quite work out. Yes, this formula is true, but only for keeping score, not for planning. It's like carefully, precisely aiming at a target, but then being impotent to achieve the results and actually hit the target, because there's no bullet in our gun.For example, to make more profit, an obvious method is to cut costs. But, of course, most costs are associated with some sort of purpose, some function. And, when you eliminate those costs, you also eliminate those functions. So, the company reduces the amount spent on new product development, cuts the number of staff in customer support, and eliminates a number of HR positions that had been dealing with internal conflict resolution, staff training and occupational health and safety. Things look good on the balance sheets for a few months, but surprise!, your products soon fall behind your competitors, your customers become unhappy, and staff conflict increases while safety and quality slip. And, the financial results don't meet up with what was expected from the simple financial planning formula.
“The events of 1660 led to a radical transformation of the government of Denmark: the administration was modified and in all the general situation of the state found itself ameliorated. From the social point of view, this did not have all the consequences one might have expected. Assuredly the inequality between classes was diminished and the bourgeoisie came closer to the landed nobility. The noble lands ceased to be so much charged with taxes; the fate of the peasants were not modified at all; on the contrary, their situation worsened.” [Histoire générale du IVe siècle à nos jours, Volume 6 by Alfred Rambaud, 618]Brandes book on Kierkegaard, one of the first major studies, rightly begins by emphasizing the relationship between Michael and Soren, which – like all intense family relationships – sucked in the surrounding history, and carved out a past for the child to carry:Soren Kiekegaard was the child of old parents; he was born old, he grew up as an old-clever child, who began to brood over himself at such a young age, that it came to him in later life as if he had been neither a child nor a youth, that is, neither without a consciousness nor a care. “My unhappiness,” he said with one of those twisting phrases that he loved, “ was, both from birth and strengthening into my education: not to be an adult man.” He meant by this, that he was a spirit, a very inordinate and comprehensive expression, in order to say something particular about one individual. … in old barbaric times one might perhaps have found this all to unchildish kid to be a changeling, that the fairies had laid in the cradle.”And so it happens that one shepherd boy in this culture that has long operated as a Moloch to such shepherd boys – one that has long made them the object of suspicion and accusation (literally – contemporary researchers have been surprised, mining the criminal archives of Europe, that bestiality outranks sodomy in those files, and the shepherd boy is often accused) – gets an opportunity. Much like a character in Balzac, he is the beneficiary of the attenuated but still active family network that connects the country to the city, the pious harsh Jutland peasant to the drygoods store in Copehagen. It was wool and the small colonial commodities (the song of sugar, spice, tobacco all over again – our familiar spirits) that made Michael Kierkegaard a relatively well off man.
Post a Comment